|
November 29, 2007 Governor Edward G. Rendell’s Office Dear Governor Rendell, We, the undersigned consumers, dairy farmers, farm and agricultural organizations, public health, animal protection and environmental groups, food processors and retailers are writing to protest the recent Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) action which would prohibit farmers from telling consumers that they aren't using artificial hormones on their dairy cows. In late October, PDA informed 16 dairies that they cannot use certain labels on milk as of January 1, 2008, including "Our farmers' pledge: no artificial growth hormones," "From cows not treated with the growth hormone rBST," and "free of artificial growth hormones." We are opposed to this action for the following reasons: -- This PDA action interferes with consumers right-to-know about the foods they eat. Many consumers prefer to buy milk produced by cows not treated with artificial hormones, as evidenced by the success in stores across the country of such milk. Consumers have a basic right to choose about the characteristics of the food they buy. -- This PDA action represents a serious infringement on the free speech rights of farmers who want to inform the public about their agricultural practices. The PDA claims that these labels can be misleading because they cannot be verified by a test. However, many label claims, including "locally grown" or "Pennsylvania grown" also cannot be verified by a test, and the PDA does not object to them. -- In 1994, after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH), the FDA also said that the following label statement, in proper context, is acceptable: "from cows not treated with rbST." Earlier this year, Monsanto asked FDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to declare these labels to be misleading. In late August, the FTC wrote to Monsanto, "The FTC staff agrees with FDA that food companies may inform consumers in advertising, as in labeling, that they do not use rBST." Thus, the PDA's action contradicts long established federal policy on this matter. -- The use of rbGH remains controversial and was not approved in Canada, Japan, and the European Union because of negative effects of rbGH use on animal health. Codex Alimentarius, the United Nations main food safety body, twice decided that it could not endorse the safety of rbGH for human health. -- This new policy on the part of PDA was issued with limited opportunity for comment or input from consumers, dairy farmers, processors or the general public. This is a violation of basic democratic process. We urge the state of Pennsylvania to rescind this poorly conceived policy which interferes with the rights of farmers, dairies and consumers and constitutes inappropriate government interference in the marketplace. Milk processors that have signed this letter simply want to be able to respond with truthful labeling to these concerns expressed by consumers and their corresponding desire to buy milk that is from cows not treated with rbGH. Yours, Scott Roy, President Rodney Martin Craig Winters, President Carl Colteryahn III Charles Margulis Kevin Golden, Staff Attorney John Stauber, Executive Director Christopher Waldrop, Director Mark A. Kastel Melissa Hughes, General Counsel Dean Sparks, CEO Dan Silver, Executive Director John Peck, Executive Director Gene Baur Bill Wenzel, National Director Marty Mesh, Executive Director Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director Beth Weaver-Kreider Jacqueline Ostfield Carrie Hahn Jamie Harvie Erica Liss Miyun Park, Vice-President Nicole G. Paquette, Interim CEO Bridget Holcomb Sylvia Zimmerman, President, Board of Directors David Wallinga, Director Jeffrey Smith, Executive Director John Knutson Frederick Kirschenmann, President Debbie Palmer William Acquaviva Shirley Ayers Kim Seeley Josh Bryceson—CSA Farm Manager Heidi Lindroth Katherine Ozer, Executive Director Sarah Gallo, Government Relations Representative Sarah Janssen, Science Fellow Ed Maltby, Executive Director Steve Gilman, Policy Coordinator Babette Pareira Liz Rog Preston Yoder Tom Gleason, President Rick North, Project Director Ronnie Cummins, Executive Director Mark Lipson, Policy Program Director Caren Wilcox, Executive Director and CEO David Masur James Browning, Director Francis Thicke Timothy LaSalle, CEO Ted Schettler, Science Director Laurel Hopwood, Chair Gary Hirshberg, President and CEO Henry Tiffany Chuck Turner, Jr. Michael Prete, General Manager Margaret Mellon, Director Phil Bereano Jill Davies Chuck Deichmann George Wright Brian Snyde
Dear Governor Rendell, Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, is writing to protest the recent Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) action which would prohibit farmers from telling consumers that they aren't using artificial hormones on their dairy cows. In late October, PDA informed 16 dairies that, as of January 1, 2008, they cannot use certain labels on milk including "Our farmers' pledge: no artificial growth hormones," "From cows not treated with the growth hormone rBST," and "free of artificial growth hormones." We are opposed to this action for the following reasons: -- This PDA action interferes with consumers right-to-know about the foods they eat. Many consumers prefer to buy milk produced by cows not treated with artificial hormones, as evidenced by the success of such milk in stores across the country. Consumers have a basic right to make choices about the characteristics of the food they buy. -- This PDA action represents a serious infringement of the free speech rights of farmers who want to inform the public about their agricultural practices. The PDA claims that these labels can be misleading because they cannot be verified by a test. However, many label claims, including "locally grown" or "Pennsylvania grown," also cannot be verified by a test and the PDA does not object to them. -- In 1994, approving use of Monsanto's recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH), after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also said that the following label statement, in proper context, is acceptable: "from cows not treated with rbST." Earlier this year, Monsanto asked FDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to declare these labels to be misleading. In late August, the FTC wrote to Monsanto, "The FTC staff agrees with FDA that food companies may inform consumers in advertising, as in labeling, that they do not use rBST." Thus, the PDA's action contradicts long established federal policy on this matter. -- The use of rbGH remains controversial and was not approved in Canada, Japan, and the European Union because of negative effects of rbGH use on animal health. Codex Alimentarius, the United Nations main food safety body, twice decided that it could not endorse the safety of rbGH for human health. -- This new policy on the part of PDA was issued with limited opportunity for comment or input from consumers, dairy farmers, processors or the general public. This is a violation of basic democratic process. We urge the state of Pennsylvania to rescind this poorly conceived policy, which interferes with the rights of farmers, dairies and consumers and constitutes inappropriate government interference in the marketplace. Yours, |