We pay good money for the food we eat and we expect its safety to be guaranteed. So shouldn’t we know if we’re eating:

A clone?
Recalled meat?
Milk from hormone-injected cows?
Food from another country with lower safety standards than ours?

Producers are required to list the ingredients and nutritional value on the labels of the food we buy. Why aren’t they required to tell us the rest of the story?

Consumers Union believes we all have the right to know what’s in the food we eat – it’s the only way to make an informed decision. We hope you will join us in our efforts to improve the information we’re given, and to make our food supply safer.

What you can do:
National efforts

Imports and Safety
Increased inspections needed for produce
Tomato-salmonella outbreaks underscores need for FDA to be more effective in enforcing food safety standards
Groups angered by inaction on CO-treated meat
A national survey indicates consumer opposition to coloring meat with carbon monoxide
Chemicals in our food and beverage containers -- Understanding the BPA issue
You may never have heard of a chemical called bisphenol A (BPA), but odds are it’s circulating in your body
New authority and funding needed for FDA
CU welcomes commitment to protect nations’ drug & food supply
The safety of Chinese seafood imports
CU testimony: It is estimated that 83 percent of the seafood we eat is imported.
Congress moves forward to protect food supply
CU calls for strong, quick, and comprehensive action by Congress, including increasing the frequency of inspections and giving the Food and Drug Administration mandatory recall authority for tainted foods.
USDA proposal to regulate leafy green produce opposed
Congress should establish a single food agency to ensure better safety
FDA Science and Mission at Risk (PDF)
The nation is at risk if FDA science is at risk. The Science Board's November 2007 report assesses whether science and technology at the FDA can support current and future regulatory needs.
How Safe Is The Food Supply? BusinessWeek (May 21, 2007)
The hamstrung FDA may be unable to prevent a contamination crisis.
Food safety in doubt Sacramento Bee (April 29, 2007)
Most imports aren't checked, experts say -- so, what are we eating?
CU opposes the "National Uniformity for Food Act"
Under the guise of national "uniformity," the bill would eliminate critical state laws that protect consumer health.
National Association of Attorneys General against "National Uniformity for Food Act"
The National Uniformity for Food Act undercuts states' rights and consumer protection.

Clones
Maryland cloned labeling effort supported
CU urges requiring labeling for at least two generations of clone progeny. Both the “children” and “grandchildren” of clones should be labeled.
CU testfies in support of Calif cloned labeling law
Labels will let California consumers choose whether to buy cloned meat and milk.
CA bill requires labeling of cloned food
In wake of FDA cloning decision, bill could restore Americans’ right to choose in the marketplace
89% of consumers want labels on cloned meat, milk
Consumers Union calls on Congress to require tracking, labeling of products from cloned animals
Coalition condemns FDA plan to allow sale of cloned food as irresponsible
Calls on FDA to respect will of Congress and maintain cloning moratorium

Recalls
CA posts names of retailers of recalled beef
CU advises California consumers to check list, freezers and urges USDA to release similar information nationally
Stores that sell recalled beef should be made public
USDA refuses to disclose to the public the names of retail outlets involved in meat recalls
US Rep. DeLauro asks USDA to disclose retail store names involved in the Hallmark/Westland meat recall
School district information that received beef products should also be released.
Farm bill will harm food safety
A coalition of farm, science, consumer and animal welfare groups wrote to the Committee on Agriculture to explain why Section 123 of the Farm Bill will impede food safety. This letter provides some quick background and the text of Section 123.

Growth hormones in milk
93 groups and dairies urge Kansas to not ban milk hormone labeling
Recent similar attempts to ban rbgh-free labels in other states have failed
Utah Governor should oppose proposed food labeling law
Bill would prohibit farmers from telling consumers that they aren’t using artificial hormones on their dairy cows.
CU applauds new Pennsylvania milk labeling rules
In reversal, state will allow labels about artificial hormones
Letter to Ohio Governor: Don't interfere with labeling
Health, agricultural, animal protection and environmental groups urge the state of Ohio not to interfere with the rights of farmers, dairies and consumers.
Pennsylvania Gov. urged to ensure consumers' right to know
A recent action by the PA Department of Agriculture interferes with consumers right-to-know about the foods we eat.

Mad Cow disease
CU urges USDA to allow private testing for mad cow disease
Using the rapid test kits that USDA itself uses is an essential approach to resolving the current crisis in Korea over importing US beef
Too many loopholes in FDA feed ban to protect from Mad Cow
FDA’s decision to only ban a limited subset of specified risk materials from all animal feed, leaves the safety of beef at risk.
Q & A: Mad cows and the Canadian border dispute
The fact that Canada has found three cases of mad cow disease to the United States’ one – and that one appears to have been born in Canada – suggests that Canada may have a more serious problem than the U.S.
Harkin, Durbin shed light on shortcomings in U.S. anti-BSE efforts
Cite GAO report highlighting surveillance, compliance questions under FDA feed rules.
Letter to USDA Secretary asking for new mad cow testing protocol
Consumers Union urges USDA to retest suspect cow identified in November 2004

Organics
Organic aquaculture standards shouldn't be fishy
Not all fish farms are created equal and can vary significantly in terms of pollution, escapes, and what the fish eat
USDA to finalize naturally-raised meat standard
Because the government’s proposed definition didn’t take into account the animal’s physical environment, consumers groups consider the standard to be misleading
Consumer Reports food-labeling poll shows consumers want to know where their food comes
Poll also found that foods labeled as “natural,” or “organic" are highly popular among consumers
Eco-labels center
Here you’ll find out what the labels on your favorite products really mean. As the popularity of green product claims continues to grow, it’s important to know which claims you can trust and which ones you can’t.

Imports and Safety
More than 76 million Americans get sick each year – and some 5,000 die – from contaminated food. Meanwhile, imports of food, some from countries without strict controls, have doubled since 2002. But the FDA inspects less than 1 percent of imports. It's a recipe for disaster.

Clones
Cloning technology is so new that the jury is still out on its safety. A majority of clones are born severely deformed and sickly; most don’t live for a year. So why is the FDA allowing cloned products on the market without labeling? Most consumers – 89 percent – want cloned food to be labeled.

Recalls
As unbelievable as it seems, there is no mandatory requirement that producers remove recalled food from supermarkets, restaurants and schools. Worse, the government doesn’t make public the names of retailers that receive tainted meat and poultry – leaving consumers guessing about the safety of the hamburger in their refrigerator.

Growth hormones in milk
Farmers who don’t use growth hormones in their cows want to label their milk as ‘no artificial hormones’ because many consumers prefer their milk produced naturally. But the big growth hormone producers are trying to block these labeling efforts – a move that would leave consumers in the dark.

Mad Cow disease
The first case of U.S. mad cow disease was discovered in December 2003, and the FDA promised to quickly clamp down on ingredients in cattle feed that can spread the disease. More than four years later, the agency still hasn’t delivered on its promise, and may never do so.

Organics
With sales of organic food increasing, conventional food producers are trying to weaken organic standards via loopholes that would allow them to label products organic even if they include synthetics or contaminants. Preserving the integrity of organic labeling is vital to consumers’ right to know what they’re buying.

 



Available for syndication. See the list of all available xml/rss feeds.
If you experience any problems with this site, please send us a short email.
Contact Consumer Reports Customer Service for subscription assistance.

ratings

All information ©1998-2008 Consumers Union