Baby
Boomers listen up! Study finds purchase of hearing aids
a frustrating experience for many (April 2003).
Trial periods, refunds and release of audiograms
among trouble spots
Nearly 4 out of 10 Americans will suffer from hearing
loss by age 65 and many of them will turn to hearing
aids to once again hear what they've been missing. But
a study
released by Consumers Union today finds that many purchasers
will become frustrated with their shopping experience
due to high costs, short trial periods, and refund offers
filled with loopholes. http://www.consumersunion.org/pdf/HearingAids.pdf
Consumers Union surveyed
hearing aid dispensers in five Texas cities -- Austin,
Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio -- last
November and examined complaints filed against sellers,
or "dispensers," of hearing aids to see what
kinds of issues concern consumers most.
"While hearing aid technology has made significant
strides of late, the sales experience is often an entirely
different matter," said Lisa McGiffert, senior
policy analyst for the Southwest Regional Office of
Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports. "Inadequate
trial periods and difficulties in getting refunds for
unsatisfactory products are a genuine sore spot with
the consumer."
Hearing loss is an increasingly important issue to
the large Baby Boomer population. There are approximately
28 million Americans afflicted by it. Every 7 seconds
a Baby Boomer turns 50 and it is projected that by the
year 2015 the number of Americans suffering from hearing
loss will increase between 20 to 25 percent. Further,
an estimated 10 percent of 40-year olds suffer hearing
impairment, and certainly years of listening to loud
music will bring more and more younger people to this
growing market.
Three out of four complaints filed against hearing
instrument fitters and dispensers from January 1, 1999
to September 1, 1999 related to problems with the 30-day
trial period and refunds. For example:
-
Consumers tried to return the aid, but the fitter
convinced them to get adjustments while the trial
period ran out.
-
Repeated repairs interfered with allowing consumers
adequate time to try out the hearing aid without
interruption.
-
Consumers could not get a refund or could not get
it in a timely way.
-
Consumers did not realize they would pay steep
"holdback" fees if they decided the hearing
aids didn't work for them.
Refund issues are important to consumers because hearing
aids are not generally covered by insurance and can
range in price from a couple hundred dollars for the
least technologically advanced models to thousands of
dollars for digital models loaded with bells and whistles.
Among the useful features and add-ons are volume control,
directional microphones, audio-input options, and a
device that allows hearing without feedback when using
the phone.
Another problem is that 50 percent of the dispensers
surveyed that offered free tests to lure customers in,
set conditions on the release of tests results, making
comparison shopping difficult. Some offered "free"
hearing evaluations but charged money to provide the
audiogram - the record of test results - to the consumer.
Others would only release the audiograms to doctors,
and two dispensers in Houston offered free tests only
if the potential customer bought the hearing aids from
them.
While Texas law is silent on the release of audiograms,
McGiffert noted: "The release of audiograms is
key to giving consumers the ability to seek a second
opinion or to find a better price before making a significant
purchasing decision."
The survey of hearing aid dispensers also found that
85 percent of dispensers charged "holdback"
fees if customers return the hearing aids within the
30-day trial period required by law. The fees are typically
a set amount or percentage of the price and can be hundreds
of dollars. High fees to return the aid lock consumers
into an unsatisfactory purchase, despite their right
to return it.
Future problems with the sale of hearing aids will
be nearly impossible to detect because the Texas Legislature
in 1999 passed sweeping confidentiality provisions making
all complaints secret. In the report, Consumers Union
recommends that the legislature make information about
complaints public again.
In addition, Consumers Union is calling on the State
Committee in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Aids
and the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language
Pathology and Audiology to:
-
Sufficiently enforce administrative penalties,
including those involving the 30-day trial period;
-
Change the contract format to allow consumers to
initial next to the specific trial period date and
the price of the holdback fee, to indicate proper
disclosure; and
-
Allow consumers to try a different hearing aid
within the 30-day period without having to pay a
high holdback fee.
CU is also asking the Legislature to provide for longer
trial periods; cap the amount of the holdback fee; and
specify that consumers be provided with a free copy
of any hearing test results. Rep. Eddie Rodriguez, D-Austin,
has filed HB 3301, which will implement various changes
recommended by Consumers Union.
"In the meantime, consumers can help themselves
by asking questions about the trial period, allowable
extensions to the trial period, the manufacturer's warranty,
and their ability to get the audiogram from the dispenser,"
McGiffert said. "They should not hesitate to shop
around and ask plenty of questions." 
|