Press Release

Tuesday, August 22, 2000

Contact:
Frank Torres/David Butler
202/462-6262
Consumers Union's Washington, DC Office

 

FEDERAL REGULATORS RELEASE
PROPOSED CONSUMER PROTECTION RULES FOR INSURANCE

Rules offer some protections, but fail to update process for consumer grievances

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Federal agencies yesterday announced proposed consumer protection rules for the sale of insurance by banks.

The proposal is part of the implementation of the Financial Services Modernization Act (also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act), a law passed last year that allows the merger of banks, insurance companies, and securities firms.

Frank Torres, legislative counsel for Consumers Union, made the following statement today after the proposals were unveiled by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of Thrift Supervision:

"Based on our initial review of this proposal, we see some decent provisions to help protect consumers, but at least one provision falls far short of what consumers need.

"The rules for disclosing the obligations and risks of insurance are simple and reasonable. We are also pleased to see strong rules aimed at preventing coercion. They explicitly state that banks cannot force consumers to buy insurance in order to get another product. Another important provision is that states would be allowed to approve a stronger set of rules if they choose.

"However, these rules contain a serious flaw. They fail to update the process for consumers to get their grievances addressed by their banks. Consumers can no longer count on being able to take their complaints directly to a bank employee that they've known personally for years. Today consumers may be dealing with a person in another state a thousand miles away. Consumers need a more comprehensive system for making complaints and getting a response.

"In fact, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley law allows regulators to expand and improve the system for grievances, but these rules leave the system the way it is. In other words, the law gives consumers the right to a better grievance process and it gives federal agencies the authority to establish that right. But the proposed rules don't offer any changes in the process we have today, which may not be adequate to address the needs of consumers in the new financial marketplace. Simply maintaining the status quo was not the intent of Congress. At a minimum the regulators should use this opportunity to create a grievance process that will truly help consumers.

"Consumers Union will study these rules closely and offer a more detailed review when we submit our comments during the public comment period."

***

Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports magazine, is an independent, nonprofit testing and information-gathering organization, serving only the consumer. We are a comprehensive source of unbiased advice about products and services, personal finance, health, nutrition, and other consumer concerns. Since 1936, our mission has been to test products, inform the public, and protect consumers. Consumers Union is online at www.consumersunion.org.

 


[ Health ] [ Finance ] [ Food ] [ Product ] [ Telecom ] [ Other ]
[ About CU ] [ News ] [ Resources ] [ Tips ] [ Search ]
[ Home ]


Please contact us at: http://www.consumersunion.org/contact.htm
All information ©2000 Consumers Union