|
Executive
Summary
Report
Recommendations
Texas
Independent Review Law Side Bar
How
it Works Side Bar
Hospital
Care Strictly Limited Side Bar
Substance
Abuse and Teens Side Bar
Eating
Disorders Side Bar
Workers
Compensation Leg Side Bar
Alcohol
Detox Side Bar
Press
Release
Report
(PDF format)
|
Eating
Disorders
Review decisions
relating to eating disorders, a subset of mental health appeals in our
study, illustrate some of the dangers of an over-reliance on outpatient
treatments in today's managed care environment. During the six month period
of our study, IROs considered 11 eating disorder appeals and overturned
seven of them.
According to the American Dietetic Association (ADA), more than 5 million
Americans suffer from eating disorders. Five percent of females and one
percent of males have anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating
disorder. An estimated 85 percent of all eating disorders, now the third
most common chronic illness in adolescent females, begin during adolescence.(1)
Eating disorders involve both physical deterioration and mental illness,
such as depression, anxiety, and obsessive behavior. As a result, treatment
for these disorders must focus both on mental and physical health. The
ADA recommends an interdisciplinary team composed of professionals from
medical, nutritional, and mental health disciplines to manage and assess
eating disorders. According to the ADA, medical nutrition therapy and
psychotherapy are two integral parts of treating eating disorders, especially
since the patient may require continued psychological support even after
recovering medically in order to sustain the change.(2)
Like those appeals involving mental illness or substance abuse cases,
reviewers based their decisions heavily on the patients' history and chance
of recovery outside an inpatient or residential treatment settings. If
the patients showed insight into their illnesses, improved mentally and
physically during their time spent as inpatients, and had supportive families,
the reviewer would uphold the HMO's denial.
But some HMO guidelines appear to rely primarily on weight gain as the
trigger to end inpatient care. Independent reviewers looked at both physical
and mental capacity to return to a more normal life. In one case, a IR
reviewer wrote that while the patient had gained weight and maintained
caloric intake, she remained "extremely anxious" about this
weight gain, and continued to have obsessive and "distorted illness
thoughts." Leaving inpatient care would have been very detrimental
to her recovery.(3) According to the ADA,
"weight restoration alone does not indicate recovery, and forcing
weight gain without psychological support and counseling is contraindicated."(4)
Patients released prematurely from inpatient treatment may land right
back in the hospital, even more ill. A 21-year-old woman entered an inpatient
care facility on Nov. 21, 2000 due to complications resulting from her
eating disorder and depression with suicidal thoughts. The HMO covered
nine days of inpatient treatment then discontinued her certification.
A TMF reviewer upheld this decision, claiming that due to lack of documentation
of her suicidal intent and the fact that her eating disorder was no longer
acute, any days after Nov. 30 were not medically necessary.("5)
Within two months the woman was readmitted. According to a new assessment
of her case, after leaving the inpatient setting for residential treatment
the first time, she felt anxious and overwhelmed when seeing food in the
refrigerator and pantry. Her anxiety continued to grow as she gained weight
over the next few weeks. Her practice of binging and purging resurfaced,
her depression increased, and she attempted suicide in the shower. The
residential facility determined that she should return to an inpatient
setting on Jan. 30, 2001. The HMO denied the request, but this time the
independent reviewer overturned the denial.
"Insurance companies, in general, have failed to recognize the seriousness
of eating disorders, which have mortality rates in chronic patients, of
up to 20 percent," said the reviewer. This particular patient probably
should have stayed longer in her initial inpatient treatment program,
as she "manifested most of the risk factors associated with bad outcome
and death in this patient population," according to the reviewer,
adding that she was unsafe in a residential care facility.(6)
One indicator of inadequate hospital treatment or discharge planning is
rapid hospital readmission after discharge. According to a 1996 study
of quality indicators in the managed behavior health care industry (and
cited by the U.S. Surgeon General), rapid readmission occurred in 2 percent
to 41 percent of discharges depending on the managed care plan. Despite
methodological problems, the Surgeon General warned in 1999 that these
kind of indicators "raise concerns about real differences in quality"
among managed behavioral health plans.(7)
One HMO denied inpatient care to three different women with eating disorders.
All three denials were overturned. The IRO found that these patients feared
returning home and being around food, continued to express compulsive
desires to exercise, and remained depressed and/or suicidal. The reviewers
concluded that the women needed to improve in these areas before they
could successfully battle their eating disorders in an outpatient or residential
setting.(8)
The ADA believes that patients with eating disorders usually progress
along these stages: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action,
and maintenance. The organization warns that "frequent backsliding"
among these stages usually occur during a patient's recovery. Thus, premature
release from a treatment setting, no matter what that setting may be,
could be harmful to the patient.
Because relatively few patients actually pursue independent review of
their insurance denials (see discussion, p. 8), we believe that the number
and severity of eating disorder cases that came before reviewers during
the short period of our study warrants further research, and may indicate
a need to examine managed behavioral health plan utilization guidelines
for this disease.
_____
Footnotes:
1. "Position
of the American Dietetic Association: Nutrition Intervention in the Treatment
of Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, and Eating Disorders not Otherwise
Specified," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Volume
101, No. 7, July 1, 2001, pg. 810. (ADA Statement)
2. ADA Statement, pg. 810.
3. Independent Review, Inc., IRO Decision Letter, Corphealth, 8/24/2002.
4. ADA Statement, pg. 810.
5. Texas Medical Foundation, IRO Decision Letter, BCBS/Magellan, 4/4/2001.
6. Independent Review, Inc., IRO Decision Letter, Magellan, 4/4/2001.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration, "Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon
General - Executive Summary," 1999, p. 425. Independent Review, IRO
Decision Letter, Pacificare, 6/13/2001. Envoy, IRO Decision Letter, Pacificare,
9/26/2001.
8. ADA Statement, pg. 810.
|