|
|
Animal Factories
Pollution and Health Threats to
Rural Texas
This article was written by the Consumers Union
Southwest Regional
Office.
Available in PDF
Format.
|
that Smith Farms Egg Facility Get Proper Permits to Pollute Smith Farms, Inc., is a large egg-layer poultry CAFO that
has operated in Flatonia, Texas for several decades. In 1984
Smith Farms proposed a plan to the Texas Department of Water
Resources (an agency which later became part of the Texas
Water Commission and then the TNRCC) to house up to 228,000
laying hens in six buildings and utilize a liquid (lagoon)
waste system. (1) Under
departmental policy at that time, such facilities required
no formal approval or permit to operate and Smith Farms was
advised to continue with their plan.
(2) However, when Smith Farms proposed an expansion of their
facilities in 1987, the agency notified the CAFO that
regulatory changes now required the company to apply for a
permit. The agency asked Smith Farms to submit an
application and also provided a copy of the rules, a permit
application, and other informational materials to the
company. (3) The agency did not follow-up its request until May 1989,
when the Texas Water Commission (TWC) conducted an
inspection of Smith Farms in response to a citizen complaint
about a discharge from the lagoon. (4)
TWC sent another copy of the rules to Smith
Farms and gave the CAFO a deadline of October 1, 1989 to
submit the application. (5)
Smith Farms did not reply. The agency did not take action on the delinquent permit
until four years later, on March 2, 1993, when it
investigated yet another illegal discharge complaint.
Inspectors found the facility in violation of regulations,
discharging excess waste into a second unlined pond which
was overflowing manure waste onto neighboring property.
(6) The TWC issued a Notice of
Violation to Smith Farms on May 3, 1993 and requested that
corrective action be taken, as well as a permit application
be filed, by June 4, 1993.
(7) Smith Farms did not honor that date to make a formal
written response. Instead representatives from Smith Farms
and the TWC met on June 24, 1993. During the meeting Smith
Farms promised to correct the violations, however the
company argued that it was not required to obtain a permit
because of its exemption from permitting under the 1984
rules. It requested that the permit requirement be rescinded
in lieu of a Waste Management Plan which the company
promised to submit by October 1, 1993.
(8) Smith Farms did not keep its promise and the Plan was
never submitted. The agency did not act again until April
1994, when TNRCC (having replaced TWC as the regulatory
agency) revisited Smith Farms. Inspectors noted illegal
waste discharges off-site, a pile of improperly disposed
dead chickens on the property, and offensive odors.
(9) The same month, TNRCC
investigated another complaint at the facility and
discovered illegal discharges onto adjacent property as well
as noxious odors. (10)
The Commission replied to both the Texas Department of
Health and the citizens that their comments had not
demonstrated "technical merit" and that the Smith Farms
permit application met all the requirements for issuance.
(14) Unknown to the public,
however, was that TNRCC facilitated the approval of the
permit despite the fact that Smith Farms had submitted an
incomplete application. According to TNRCC documents, Smith Farms "failed to
submit the minimum information required for processing under
the new rules" (Subchapter K). (15)
But rather than return the application as
incomplete, the agency "decided.we will process [the
application] under the old rules which allow for a
longer period of time for review as well as allows more
flexibility on the part of the applicant documentation."
(16) On November 1, 1996,
TNRCC authorized the air and water quality permit for Smith
Farms. (17) 2 Letter to Bryan Berger, Smith Farms, Inc., from Texas Department of Water Resources, February 27, 1984. 3 Letter to Bryan Berger, Smith Farms, Inc,. from Texas Water Commission, August 26, 1987. 4 Letter to Bryan Berger, Smith Farms, Inc., from Texas Water Commission, August 21, 1989. 5 Ibid. 6 Texas Water Commission, Investigation Report EF# 930300736, Smith Farms, Inc., March 2, 1993. 7 Ibid. (1993); Letter to Bryan Berger, Smith Farms, Inc., from Texas Water Commission, re: Complaints concerning egg laying facility, May 3, 1993. 8 Texas Water Commission, Enforcement Action Request Memo re: Smith Farms, Inc., to Mark McFarland, Manger, Permitting and Enforcement Section, Agricultural & Rural Assistance Division, June 1, 1994; Vernon D. Rowe, Rowe Environmental, letter to Diana L. Bell, TWC, re: Smith Farms, Inc., June 24, 1993. 9 Texas Water Commission, Enforcement Action Request Memo re: Smith Farms, Inc., to Mark McFarland, Manger, Permitting and Enforcement Section, Agricultural & Rural Assistance Division, June 1, 1994 (including Picture Set #2). 10 TNRCC, Investigation Report EF#940600505, Smith Farms, Inc., April 28, 1994. 11 Letter to Bryan Berger, Smith Farms, Inc., from TNRCC, September 20, 1995. 12 TNRCC, Deposit User Report, Deposit Voucher #: 401737, September 5, 1995. 13 Letter to TNRCC from Elias Briseno, Texas Department of Health, re: Air and Water Permit-By-Rule for Smith Farms, Inc., July 23, 1996. 14 Letter to Elias Briseno, Texas Department of Public Health, from TNRCC, re: Smith Farms, Inc., Application for Permit-By-Rule No. 03866, September 27, 1996. 15 Interoffice Memorandum to Kerry Howard, TNRCC Agriculture Permitting Team, from Desiderio Mora, Permitting Team Leader, re: Smith Farms Processing Under Subchapter B, September 20, 1995. 16 Ibid. 17 TNRCC, Air and Water Quality Permit-By-Rule to Operate A Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation, Smith Farms, Inc., Permit No. 03866, November 1, 1996. |
![]()
[ Health
] [ Finance
] [ Food
] [ Product
] [ Telecom
] [ Other
]
[ About
CU ] [ News
] [ Resources
] [ Tips
] [
Search ]
[ Home
]
![]()
Please contact us at: http://www.consumersunion.org/contact.htm
All information ©2000 Consumers Union