|
Executive
Summary
Report
Credit
Score Side
Freebies Side
Bait
and Switch Side
New
Home? Side
Downpayment
Fraud
Side
Spanish
Speakers
Side
No
Credit? Side
Special
Order Side
When
the Bottom...
Side
Press
release
Press
release
(En Espanol)
Report
Info Page
|
Contract
Signing Locks In Purchase
Sometimes
consumers report signing a purchase contract at the same time they
leave a deposit, and sometimes they return to sign the purchase contract.
Dealers sometimes argue that once a purchase contract is signed, the
consumer is contractually bound to accept the home-even though they
may not have seen it or agreed to financing terms.
James E. of Tyler signed contracts and left $500 but changed his mind
within hours. The salesperson refused his written cancelation notice
and said he would have to come up with $1,500 more, according to Mr.
E's wife. He got his money back a few days later. Under the deposit
law, consumers can still cancel after signing purchase contracts.
As currently interpreted by TDHCA staff, dealers are required to fully
refund a consumer's investment unless the consumer has signed a loan
agreement and the funds on deposit have been transferred to the down
payment.(16)
Victor S. of Canutillo and his wife went out to shop for a mobile
home. In an initial visit to a Nationwide dealership, they picked
a home, signed a purchase contract, and asked for copies. They also
signed over their own home title as earnest money. Told they could
have copies of their paperwork at "closing," they went home
empty handed and unsure about the deal. That same day, they decided
to shop around some more and called the dealer to cancel. When another
dealer offered a better price and interest rate, they called to get
their title back.
"We told him we just want to pick up our title, and he said that
he was going to keep our title if we didn't purchase a home from him.
He also said that he could keep our mobile home if he wanted to because
my husband had signed papers and that if we wanted our title we had
to send him our attorney." The new dealer contacted Nationwide's
national office, which ordered the title released, but the first dealer
filed a report with the credit bureau saying the consumer owed $60,000.
The dealer refused to remove the chargeoff from the credit report
even after contact by the AG unless "he comes in, honors the
contract signed and takes his home."(17)
According to the dealer, this home was a special order home (see story,
p. 24). Although the family cancelled the same day, refund rights
for special order homes are much more limited. Further, the law does
not prohibit dealers from placing the full cost of the home on a consumer's
credit report as an unpaid debt.
Ms. F. of Hidalgo left $500 at a dealership in Weslaco, thinking that
she would have no additional out of pocket costs for her manufactured
home purchase. She signed some documents but didn't really know what
they were because they were all in English. At closing she discovered
they wanted her to pay $6,000 more-money she didn't have. She walked
out of closing and asked for her $500 dollars back. After waiting
three weeks she turned to the Attorney General for help. The AG ultimately
got her deposit back from the dealer, and she eventually purchased
a different mobile home on terms she understood (no surprises at closing).
She is very happy now in her new home, according to her interview
with Consumers Union.(18)
Many consumers put down money and sign a purchase contract based on
a dealer promise to get them credit approval. Before 1999, Texas law
specifically required dealers to return all but $100 (or 10% of the
deposit, whichever was less) if they were unable to corral a lender.
Today, the law requires a refund in full.(19)
But some consumers turned down for credit still reported considerable
difficulty getting their money back.
A Spanish speaking couple from Austin left $1,000 on a home in 2000,
contingent on credit approval. Their credit was not approved. Four
weeks later they hired a lawyer to help them get their money back.(20)
After a dealer said her credit had already been approved, a disabled
Caldwell, Texas woman put $1,500 down on a home-money she borrowed
from a sister's credit card account. But soon after, the salesman
told her that her credit was not approved after all. More than nine
weeks later she sought help from the Attorney General to get her sister's
money back.(21)
Rather than give back a consumer's deposit, dealers sometimes try
to force consumers who have been turned down for credit into alternative
financing or another home. Another Spanish speaking couple in San
Juan left their deposit with a promise of credit approval. When the
dealer couldn't get a loan approved, he suggested the couple find
someone else to buy the house for them (called a "buy for"
deal). They refused and filed a complaint when the dealer didn't return
their money.(22) Ms. W. of New Waverly
left $1,200 on a 1999 home. Weeks later the salesperson told her she
had not qualified for credit on the 1999 trailer, but they would sell
her a 1980 model instead. She didn't want the older model, and asked
for her money back. The dealer refused because "he had gotten
me approved for a home," she told the Attorney General, even
though it was not a home she wanted to buy. "I told him that
I was coming to bring the high Sheriff with me. He told me that I
could bring God, that I wouldn't be able to get it [her deposit] back."(23)
While some consumers report a single "closing" with purchase
and all loan contracts, others report more than one trip to the dealership:
once for the purchase contract (with the deposit) and again for the
loan closing. Once the purchase contract is signed, but before the
loan closing, construction on the lot may begin (clearing, foundation,
electric hookups, septic, etc.), and those contractors will need to
be paid. By the loan "closing," the consumer is essentially
locked into the deal.
A retired military man from Kemp, Texas selected a home for $67,000.
By the time he went to the loan closing at the dealership, his slab
had already been poured, although the home itself had not yet been
delivered. As he reviewed the loan documents, he noticed that his
home price had risen to a remarkable $80,900. Although he was shocked,
he continued with the closing because the workers had to be paid.
Ms. R. of Kingsland had the dealer completely redo the loan documents
at closing. "My mother told me to walk out," she said. "I
was stuck in a hard place, because Palm Harbor had K--- installing
my septic and paying for it $2,400, and B--- Construction putting
my pad down for the double wide, $1,500. If I did not go through with
it, someone had to pay them."(24)

The image of old, dilapidated trailers abandoned
by their
owners continues to haunt the industry.
Footnotes:
_____
16 Complaint to
the Office of the Attorney General, 8/16/99, Tyler, Texas. 10 Texas
Administrative Code, Chapter 80, Proposed Art. 80.124(d). Although the
statute requiring a full refund became effective Sept. 1, 1999, the
agency is only now in the process of drafting rules. Its still unpublished
proposal clarifies that money put down on a home is a "deposit"
until the consumer signs a loan contract turning the "deposit"
is into a "down payment" (the consumer's share of the purchase
price). Deposits are refundable. Downpayments are not.
17 Complaint to Office of the Attorney General, 2/1/99, Canutillo, Texas.
18 Complaint to Office of the Attorney General, 8/2/00, Hidalgo, Texas.
19 Texas Finance Code, Subchapter G, Sec. 347.303, repealed, 76th Texas
Legislature, Sept. 1, 1999. Texas Manufactured Housing Standards Act
(Art. 5221f, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), Sec. 6(m), effective Sept.
1, 1999.
20 Complaint to Office of the Attorney General, 9/16/99, Austin, Texas.
Under the refund law in effect at the time of this family's transaction,
the dealer could retain 10 percent or $100, but should have immediately
returned the remainder.
21 Complaint to Office of the Attorney General, fall, 2000, Caldwell,
Texas.
22 Complaint to Office of the Attorney General, 3/26/01, San Juan, Texas.
23 Complaint to the Office of the Attorney General, 9/20/99, New Waverly,
Texas.
24 Complaint to the Office of the Attorney General, 12/14/99, Kemp,
Texas; 11/6/00, Kingsland, Texas.
|