![]() |
![]() |
| Manufactured Housing: Report | |
Paper
Tiger
Missing Dragon
Poor Service and Worse Enforcement Leave Manufactured
Homeowners in the Lurch
Executive Summary
While
some structural components of manufactured homes have improved in recent years,
many components of these homes still trouble consumers and may affect their long-term
value.
Poor quality plumbing fixtures, trim and floor coverings poorly
affixed, transportation damage and faulty installation, leave consumers with less
home than they thought they purchased.
Many consumers reported extensive
trouble getting final installation and repairs completed under their warranty
contracts.
When they try to get help from the state, they face nearly insurmountable
barriers-a remarkable 36 percent of complainants with warranty problems were rejected
by Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Manufactured Housing Division
(TDHCA) without any investigation.
Consumer
satisfaction
Only a third of manufactured homeowners surveyed (36
percent) were more satisfied than dissatisfied with their new homes, with 17 percent
of homeowners completely dissatisfied.
A stunning 79 percent of new owners
indicated that they had experienced problems with their homes, even if they were
generally satisfied.
Manufactured homeowners continue to report slightly lower
satisfaction levels than conventional homeowners, and as the home aged, satisfaction
among manufactured homeowners dropped faster (-1.7 percent annually) than satisfaction
levels among conventional homeowners (-0.6 percent annually).
Problems
with the home
Consumers Union sampled 300 complaints from the thousands
filed at the TDHCA, and reviewed HUD data. Window, door, trim, and floor covering
complaints topped the list, along with a variety of installation problems.
General plumbing problems appear to have improved since the 70s, as have roof
problems, but low cost plumbing fixtures continue to plague buyers. Manufactured
home owners performed major repairs on their plumbing fixtures at a rate 57 percent
higher than site built homeowners.
Poor
Service
Consumers reported problems getting repairs from retailers and
manufacturers under the warranty on the home. Limited duration, coverage limits,
blame shifting among parties, and poor service left many consumers unsatisfied.
Nearly three out of ten (28 percent) of consumers with problems were "completely
dissatisfied" with the warranty work on their home.
Getting
help
Consumers who have problems with their homes have few options.
Arbitration agreements block access to the courts, leaving regulatory relief the
only option for some. A federal law requires states to develop a dispute resolution
program for manufactured home complaints by 2006. We examined the existing Texas
program as a case study for creating new programs as well as for reforming existing
ones.
Consumers Union examined the outcomes for 1,786 "warranty"
complaints, an area where TDHCA has clear jurisdiction to enforce both state and
federal law. A remarkable 36 percent of complaints (639 separate cases) were closed
immediately by the Department with no action. About 3/4s of these complaints were
closed because the consumer could not prove that they had notified the manufacturer
and retailer in writing about their problems during the warranty period and at
least 40 days prior to contacting the department. Most consumers report ongoing
telephone exchanges rather than written correspondence.
Every consumer
has a right to an inspection by the Department upon request, but TDHCA does not
tell them about this right.
Even consumers who successfully get an inspection
frequently report that the Department finds very little wrong with their home-determining
that many items are "cosmetic" or "non-codable."
Where the Department finds serious "codable" problems with the the home,
they require the company to fix the problem. Only companies that do not complete
repairs required by TDHCA are found to be in violation of regulations, even though
the original problem was a violation of the law.
In correspondence with a
random sample of complainants, Consumers Union found 69 percent (25 of 36) were
"completely dissatisfied" with the resolution of their case after the
TDHCA process. One consumer stated her inspector called TDHCA a "paper tiger."
Recommendations
About
CU | News|Publications|En EspaŅol
Tips|Support CU
|Search|Privacy Policy
All information © 1998-2003 Consumers Union