Home | News | About Us | FAQ
 
...working for a fair, just
and safe marketplace for all...

Home Page


Press Release

March 7, 2001

Contact:

Reggie James and Rafael Ayuso, Consumers

Union

(512) 477-4431, ext. 117 and 114;

or Mary Kelly, Texas Center for Policy Studies

(512) 474-0811



Pesticides in parks: Study ranks Midland ranks first

in pesticide use per acre, percentage of toxic pesticides

Seventy-four

percent of pest-killers in Midland's parks carried EPA's "DANGER"

label

AUSTIN, Texas - Midland trumped cities

several times its size in pesticide use in 1998, ranking third statewide in

overall volume and first in pesticide use per acre, according to a study released

today by the Texas Pesticide Information Network.


The Texas Pesticide Information Network, an Austin-based nonprofit organization,

surveyed Texas' 26 largest cities to determine the magnitude, frequency and

potential health risks of toxic chemical use in parks. The results of the study

are presented in a report, Play at Your Own Risk: the Hidden Dangers of Pesticide

Use in Texas' City Parks, and accompanying Web site, http://www.txpin.org/parks.

Midland used 7,719 pounds of pesticides

in its public parks in 1998, exceeded only by Forth Worth and Garland. When

the cities were ranked according to pesticide use per acre, though, Midland

jumped to first place, with more than seven pounds applied for each acre of

parkland it maintained.

Midland fared no better in the study's

toxicity index, computed by weighting each city's pesticides according to their

Environmental Protection Agency toxicity designations. Midland again ranked

first, with 74 percent of its pesticides bearing the EPA's "DANGER"

label-second only to the "POISON/DANGER" rating the agency assigns

to the most acutely toxic chemicals available.

Statewide, city parks departments

reported using 75,000 pounds of pesticides in Texas public parks in 1998, almost

one-third of which classify as moderately or highly toxic under Environmental

Protection Agency standards.

"Contrary to popular conception,

pesticides are not safe, particularly for children," said Reggie James,

director of CU's Southwest Regional Office. "When even seemingly benign

pest-killers are linked to cancer, it's time to examine the potential dangers

we're exposed to every day in the name of pretty grass and ant-free picnics."

The 26 cities surveyed include a

combined population of 8.8 million people and 2,922 city parks occupying more

than 76,000 acres. In addition to the 75,000 pounds of pesticides applied, the

cities reported using at least 100,000 pounds of "weed-and-feed" fertilizers

often laced with pesticides.

While communities in other states,

including California and New York, have begun to phase out toxic pesticide practices,

a law passed in Texas in 1993 actually prohibits cities from regulating pesticide

sales and use. Texas also lags behind states that require city parks departments

to report their pesticide practices.

"Since Texas does not require

cities to report even basic details about pesticide use, as some states now

do, it is difficult to make a comprehensive assessment of the potential effects

of pesticide use in city parks," said Mary Kelly, director of the Texas

Center for Policy Studies. "Furthermore, without a reporting requirement,

there is little public oversight or accountability for pesticide use in parks

and incentives for using healthier alternatives to pesticides may be reduced."

Of the cities surveyed, Midland ranked

first both in pesticide use per acre and percentage of toxic pesticide applications,

with 74 percent of its pesticides bearing the EPA's DANGER label (second only

to the agency's POISON/DANGER distinction.) Odessa and Brownsville ranked next

in toxicity, while Garland, Wichita Falls, Irving and Tyler followed Midland

in pesticide use per acre.

Cities with the lowest pesticide

use indices included Corpus Christi, El Paso, College Station, San Antonio and

Lubbock.

The golf courses CU surveyed used

four times more pesticides per acre than other types of parks on average. They

also tended to use more toxic pesticides.

Herbicide use accounted for a whopping

75 percent of the cities' total pesticide applications, while insecticides represented

19 percent of applications. Particularly troubling is the widespread use of

the herbicide glyphosphate, sold in stores as Roundup, Rodeo and Kleen-Up, which

has been linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in animals.

Twelve cities out of 26 said they

used the insecticide Dursban and similar insecticides containing the active

ingredient chlorpyrifos - banned by the EPA in June 2000 because of its potential

adverse effects on children's nervous system and brain development. Dursban

accounted for more than one-quarter of overall insecticide applications in parks.

The EPA ruling allows Dursban to

remain on retail shelves through December 2001. Professional applicators may

continue using existing stock of Dursban after its sale is banned.

"This study has two broad implications,"

James said. "One, it's time for Texas to institute a reporting requirement

to better track pesticide use. Two, the state Legislature should give communities

back the power to regulate pesticides and explore healthier alternatives. Why

does it make sense to deprive a municipality of the right to control its own

pesticide use, when safer parks demand it?"

Key policy recommendations in the

CU report include:

· Keep local pesticide use

information in a central location, preferably computerized in a format easily

accessible to the public, government officials and pest control professionals.

· Require cities over a

certain size to report annual pesticide use information to the Texas Structural

Pest Control Board for analysis and examination.

· Repeal the state law that

prohibits any city, county or other local body from regulating its own pesticide

use.

· Post visible, informative

and easy-to-understand notice before and after pesticide application in public

parks.

· Require that local governments

adopt an "integrated pest management" policy in public parks that

reduces pesticide use wherever possible and uses the least toxic treatments

available when pesticide use is unavoidable. Texas' public school districts

have already implemented IPM policies.


## 30 ##




Available for syndication. See the list of all available xml/rss feeds.
If you experience any problems with this site, please send us a short email.

Contact Consumer Reports Customer Service for subscription assistance.



All information ©1998-2007 Consumers Union