Labeling

• Poll finds 93% of consumers want labeling on meat

• CU: Protect consumers from unsafe and expired baby food

• Groups ask OH Governor to rescind the emergency rule on dairy labeling

• Groups: Repeal Ohio decision on milk labeling

• Kansas Governor vetoes milk labeling bill

• COOL Tool

• CU concerned about USDA's meat labeling efforts

• USDA standard for naturally-raised meat sanctions unnatural practices

• Letter to Kansas Governor on rbGH milk labeling policy

• Poll: Proposed "Organic" fish standards fall short

• CR Poll: Two-thirds of Americans want FDA to inspect domestic, foreign food supply

• CU comments on Country of Origin Labeling (COOL)

• USDA should require labeling of irradiated meat

• CU lauds mandatory country of origin labeling

• OH Governor urged to modify rule on milk labels

• Letter to OH Governor regarding rule that would restrict labels on milk from cows not treated with rbGH

• Comments on the Labeling of Food Containing a Product of Cloned Animals

• Letter to Ohio Governor seeking opposition to proposed food labeling rule

• OH Governor urged to rescind rule on milk labels

• Letter to Utah Governor seeking opposition to proposed food labeling legislation

• 90 groups and dairies urge Utah to not ban milk hormone labeling

• 93 groups and dairies urge Kansas to not ban milk hormone labeling

• Letter to Kansas Ag Comm. seeking opposition to proposed food labeling legislation

• CA bill: Require labeling on cloned food

• CU applauds new Pennsylvania milk labeling rules

• Congress should require labeling of cloned food

• Good year for consumers in 2007

• CU's testimony on milk labeling before Ohio Dairy

• Coalition condemns FDA plans for cloned foods

• Consumer groups challenge veto of cloned food bill

• CU opposes "Farm Bill", H.R. 2419

• CU Comments on USDA interim final rule on COOL for fish and shellfish

• CU Comments on USDA proposed rule on COOL for meat, fruits and vegetables, and peanuts

• CU discusses Food and Drug Import Safety Act

• CU's plan to protect consumers from imports

• CU comments on the FDA proposed changes to irradiation labeling

• Consumers want labels on cloned milk and meat

• CU comments to FDA on animal cloning risk assessment

• CU testimony on the "Cloned Food Labeling Bill"

• CU supports "Cloned Food Labeling Act"

• CU urges Congress to change date of implementing mandatory country-of-origin labeling for meat, produce & peanut butter

• Without hearings, House OKs bill that kills 200 state food safety laws

• Myths vs. truth about HR 4167, National Uniformity for Food Act

• CU Derides Dark-of-Night Weakening of Organic Law

• Oppose the Bill Shielding the Fast Food Industry

• Consumers Union Offers Advice On Meat Labels That Do And Don't Help Reduce Risk Of Exposure To Mad Cow Disease

• CU asks Maine AG to deny petition that rbGH-milk labeling is "misleading"

• Letter to Oregon Governor Supporting Mandatory Labeling of Foods Using Genetic Engineering

• CU Says National Academy of Sciences Report Underlines the Need for Labeling and Safety Tests of Genetically Engineered Animals

• The future of food: Biotechnology and consumer confidence

• Comments on the USDA proposed rule on the National Organic Program

• CU Supports Genetically Engineered Food Labeling Bill Sponsored By Senator Boxer

• The Role of Science and "Other Factors" in Codex Decisions

• Key Points From: The Role Of Science And "Other Factors" In Codex Decisions

• Consumers Union Comments on Docket No. TMD-94-00-2 National Organic Program